War on Terrorism
US verses the rest of the world.
Dracula (32): Board List | Topic List | Post New Message | Log Out | Help
Page 1 of 8 | Next Page | Last Page
From: Mr Antichrist | Posted: 10/17/2002 1:34:13 PM | Message Detail
In a hyperthetical situation, who would win in an all out war between the US and the rest of the world.

Um, can we just assume that nuclear weapons and other WMDs' would not be used. Because as soon as one is detected almost everyother country with WMD capability will use theirs so no one wins.
---
Anarchy and Anti-Globalization :- board #1098
Philosophy :- board #2381
From: gytis | Posted: 10/17/2002 1:37:56 PM | Message Detail
That's easy.

The rest of the world, even if they only had the clubs and stones.
---
It isn't that the law thinks they are "too dumb," since it doesn't require much intelligence to have sexual intercourse. Polemos
From: Killer Clown | Posted: 10/17/2002 1:38:29 PM | Message Detail
Without WMD's, the US would be swamped. China alone outnumbers US citizens 4 to 1. America is a great country with one of the most advanced war machines in history, but we are not invincible.

I know one thing though, that would be one hell of a fight. I don't know any American who would just lay down and be ruled.

---
Decriminalize Marijuana! 46 Million Americans can't be wrong! http://www.MPP.org
From: gytis | Posted: 10/17/2002 1:39:18 PM | Message Detail
THe rest of teh world would reproduce faster than the Americans would inflict casualties. PLus it is the question of raw material and energy supply
---
It isn't that the law thinks they are "too dumb," since it doesn't require much intelligence to have sexual intercourse. Polemos
From: gytis | Posted: 10/17/2002 1:40:23 PM | Message Detail
I don't know any American who would just lay down and be ruled

I know one. He was found guilty of treason
---
It isn't that the law thinks they are "too dumb," since it doesn't require much intelligence to have sexual intercourse. Polemos
From: aminojaku | Posted: 10/17/2002 1:46:04 PM | Message Detail
Nobody. Even if the world didn't end up being destroyed in a nuclear firestorm, the economic fallout would be disastrous. In the end, nobody would be the "winner."

---
Xbox Live GamerTag: Aminojaku
Xbox Live Beta... woohoo
From: Sage of Halo 2 | Posted: 10/17/2002 1:48:11 PM | Message Detail
America doesn't have the oil to supply its war machine.

America loses before the first shot is fired.
---
Immense bliss and a new keyboard don't mix well. -Aggrosk8er
From: Killer Clown | Posted: 10/17/2002 1:52:01 PM | Message Detail
Actually, after the Gulf War the US government started stock-piling to use in the event of war with the oil supplying countries, plus Texas, Alaska, and the Gulf of Mexico can supply enough oil to keep it running. The US population will just have to be rationed, like in WWII.

---
Decriminalize Marijuana! 46 Million Americans can't be wrong! http://www.MPP.org
From: Mr Antichrist | Posted: 10/17/2002 1:53:53 PM | Message Detail
But still, we would be able to out last you. We would have alot more resources then you.
---
Anarchy and Anti-Globalization :- board #1098
Philosophy :- board #2381
From: Super Maximum Zero | Posted: 10/17/2002 1:56:33 PM | Message Detail
well if we just stopped all foriegn aid and the like....
well, if the subs and planes could get there before they suddenly sink, it might be a decent fight.
either way, it's pointless to debate....
---
"We should be targeting the weapons of mass destruction, not the regime."
"Yeah, but isn't that like stopping a bank robbery and not calling the police?"
Jump to Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

Copyright 1995-2002 GameFAQs
Feel free to link to this page, but not directly to the FAQs.
Why not? Read this!